Talk:Original Cumulus Wiki: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''MCrossley:''' I cannot edit this page, but I suggest that we have two versions of the Webtags pages. One organised as the current page, the other like the beta wegtags page. That would mean two links from this page. |
'''MCrossley:''' I cannot edit this page, but I suggest that we have two versions of the Webtags pages. One organised as the current page, the other like the beta wegtags page. That would mean two links from this page. |
||
[[User:Sfws|Sfws]] 17:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
(1) I agree with having the two links under 'Cumulus'; one called 'Latest release Webtags', the other called 'Beta Webtags' |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
However, if you follow that link you get a category of 'Web Tips' (note capitalisation). |
However, if you follow that link you get a category of 'Web Tips' (note capitalisation). |
||
I wrote a new page and tried to link it into the category, but neither worked for me. |
I wrote a new page and tried to link it into the category, but neither worked for me. |
||
I followed the help, so I |
I followed the help, so I hope it is a fault with the definition of the category, not me making typos. |
||
Whichever, I would like my article on HTML and script to be in the category, not an orphan. |
|||
Revision as of 17:36, 28 November 2012
MCrossley: I cannot edit this page, but I suggest that we have two versions of the Webtags pages. One organised as the current page, the other like the beta wegtags page. That would mean two links from this page.
Sfws 17:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
(1) I agree with having the two links under 'Cumulus'; one called 'Latest release Webtags', the other called 'Beta Webtags'
(2) Under articles on this page it lists a category of 'Web site tips' However, if you follow that link you get a category of 'Web Tips' (note capitalisation). I wrote a new page and tried to link it into the category, but neither worked for me. I followed the help, so I hope it is a fault with the definition of the category, not me making typos. Whichever, I would like my article on HTML and script to be in the category, not an orphan.
